Loading video player...
Rick Ferry introduces the first Bogleheads on Investing podcast featuring Jack Bogle. Discussion of Warren Buffett's praise at the 2017 Berkshire Hathaway meeting where Buffett told 40,000 attendees that Bogle has done more for the American investor than any man in the country. Buffett's 1996 endorsement of index funds is also highlighted.
Rick Ferry recounts hearing Bogle speak at the May 1996 Atlanta CFA Institute conference, which was Bogle's first public appearance after his heart transplant. Ferry describes his epiphany moment reading 'Bogle on Mutual Funds' in October 1996, realizing the data he was seeing on mutual fund underperformance matched exactly what Bogle had written. Bogle discusses writing the book in 1992-1993 despite health concerns and time constraints.
Bogle clarifies he did not have a mandatory retirement age in Vanguard's bylaws, stepping down at 65 due to health uncertainty and wanting to ensure continuity of management. By 1996, the framework of basic index funds was complete - total stock market, S&P 500, total bond market, total international. These funds have had no innovation since then and remain Vanguard's largest funds.
Bogle explains his attempt to coin the term 'Traditional Index Funds' (TIF) to contrast with ETFs. The key distinction: traditional index funds are passive funds held by passive investors, while ETFs are passive funds held by active investors. Of 2,000 ETFs, 1,000 are concentrated in speculative areas, while traditional index funds have 63% in diversified US stocks. Statistical services incorrectly mix index funds with active funds instead of separating TIF from ETF.
Bogle discusses his groundbreaking 1951 Princeton thesis on the mutual fund industry and meeting Walter Morgan, Wellington's founder (Princeton class of 1920). The thesis was the first comprehensive analysis of mutual funds, relying on Investment Company Act hearings from 1939-1940 and Wiesenberger's annual publications. The story of licensing the S&P 500 index for approximately $25,000/year is shared, with David Blitzer's retrospective comment about S&P wondering how much to charge for giving attention to their index.
Bogle describes introducing the long/intermediate/short maturity structure for municipal bonds in 1974, which revolutionized the industry. All competitors followed this model because it provided much greater clarity for clients and enabled better performance measurement. Low cost becomes extremely deterministic when markets are broken down by maturity while holding quality constant. Rick Ferry shares using Vanguard's limited and intermediate term muni funds as his benchmark for managing client municipal bonds.
Bogle reveals creating the first growth and value index funds for financial planning purposes (accumulation in growth, retirement in value) rather than performance chasing. He predicted both would have the same 25-year returns, and 25 years later both returned exactly 9%. However, investors who traded between them only earned about 5% (value) and 7% (growth) due to poor timing. Despite creating these first factor funds, Bogle remains skeptical of factors, stating 'nothing does well forever.'
Bogle explains the context of the disastrous merger during the go-go era. Wellington's balanced fund share dropped from 40% to 1% by 1958, forcing action. After American Funds, Pioneer, and Franklin all declined merger offers, Bogle settled for a 'second best' choice: merging with go-go managers running Ivest Fund. The new managers ruined Wellington Fund, giving it the worst 10-year balanced fund record in the industry. The company faced 83 consecutive months of redemptions.
Bogle explains the unprecedented structure created when he was fired as management company CEO but retained as fund chairman. Mutual funds are essentially corporate shells that hire external managers. Normally when a manager fires its president, the funds follow in lockstep. This didn't happen because old Wellington directors barely maintained majority and believed in Bogle. This created something never seen before: an operating firm with a CEO, no conflicts of interest, and a small 28-person staff initially limited to administration and shareholder recordkeeping.
Bogle details the creation of the first index mutual fund in September 1975, just 4 months after Vanguard began operations. The August 1976 underwriting aimed to raise $250 million but only brought in $11 million - 'the worst underwriting probably in the history of Wall Street.' Brokers wouldn't sell it due to lower 5% commissions versus typical 7.5-8% and no ongoing trading commissions. With only $11 million, they sampled approximately 275 stocks, managed part-time by a woman whose full-time job was working in her husband's furniture store in Wilmington, Delaware.
The first index fund took 10-12 years to reach its first billion dollars - growth was painfully slow. Bogle merged another Wellington fund into it to get enough assets to finally buy all 500 stocks in round lots and converted it to no-load. By 1990, Vanguard had $55 billion total but less than 10% ($5 billion) in index funds. The momentum accelerated: 60% by 2010, now 78% in index funds. The bond market fund naming story with the SEC is shared - they couldn't call it 'bond index fund' but could call it 'bond market index fund.'
Bogle outlines Vanguard's manager selection criteria: Philosophy, People, Portfolio, and Performance - in that specific order. Performance is deliberately last because 'it doesn't repeat' and has cost investors hundreds of billions in poor timing decisions. The Magellan Fund serves as a cautionary example: grew to $110 billion during strong performance, never did well since, now at $11 billion (a loss of $100 billion withdrawn or lost). By Bogle's 1996 retirement, 31% of Vanguard assets were in index funds.
Bogle argues that major fund companies must eventually mutualize to survive. Mutual companies give all management profits back to shareholders, while external managers owned by conglomerates or public shareholders demand 15-20% returns - a direct conflict with fund shareholders. Of the 50 largest fund companies, 40-41 are externally managed. The mantra 'cost is almost everything' is emphasized: 7% gross returns over 50 years yield $30 per dollar invested, while 5% (after 2% costs) yields only $10 - two-thirds of returns consumed by costs. Vanguard has saved investors an estimated $217 billion.
Bogle calls for a complete rewrite of the Investment Company Act of 1940, proposing a 'Financial Institutions Act of 2030.' The 1940 Act was written mainly to curb abuses of closed-end companies from the late 1920s that vanished in the 1930s. It regulates individual funds rather than fund complexes, creating absurdities like each fund being limited to 10% of voting stock in any company - but what about complexes with 20 funds? The framework has too many patches and needs comprehensive modernization.
Bogle credits the Bogleheads community as an 'enormous asset to Vanguard' and likely 'the most popular financial website' with nothing to sell but 'good grace and good advice.' Their complaints helped improve Vanguard's service. He also emphasizes academia's critical role: few business school investment courses don't teach indexing. Key academics mentioned include Andy Lo (MIT), Bill Sharpe, Burton Malkiel (Princeton), and David Swensen (Yale). The combination of grassroots Bogleheads and ivory tower academic support has been instrumental in the index revolution's success.
15 topics covered
2 speakers
10 concepts discussed
Want to explore more videos? Browse our searchable library.